U.S. v. Polk, 4:10CR3053-2. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190314c13
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , District Judge . I have carefully considered the submissions of Mr. Polk, the Assistant Federal Public Defender, and the Assistant United States Attorney. Regrettably, I conclude that I cannot grant Mr. Polk the relief he seeks. First, and among other reasons, Mr. Polk's health condition is not, based upon the record before me, sufficient to warrant compassionate release. Second, I do not believe that I have jurisdiction to grant Mr. Polk relief based upon a recomput
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , District Judge . I have carefully considered the submissions of Mr. Polk, the Assistant Federal Public Defender, and the Assistant United States Attorney. Regrettably, I conclude that I cannot grant Mr. Polk the relief he seeks. First, and among other reasons, Mr. Polk's health condition is not, based upon the record before me, sufficient to warrant compassionate release. Second, I do not believe that I have jurisdiction to grant Mr. Polk relief based upon a recomputa..
More
ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, District Judge.
I have carefully considered the submissions of Mr. Polk, the Assistant Federal Public Defender, and the Assistant United States Attorney. Regrettably, I conclude that I cannot grant Mr. Polk the relief he seeks. First, and among other reasons, Mr. Polk's health condition is not, based upon the record before me, sufficient to warrant compassionate release. Second, I do not believe that I have jurisdiction to grant Mr. Polk relief based upon a recomputation of good time credit. And in any event, it does not appear that the good time credit provision of the First Step Act has been implemented. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion for compassionate release and recomputation of good time credit (filing no. 236) is denied. The motion to restrict (filing no. 239) is granted.
Source: Leagle
