Meyer v. Big Sky Resort, CV 18-02-BU-BMM-JTJ. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20190123c46
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOHN JOHNSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court conducted a hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery on January 17, 2018. For the reasons stated in open court, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The portion of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel relating to Plaintiff's Interrogatory No.1 (Doc. 41-1) is DENIED. Defendant Big Sky Resort's response to Interrogatory No. 1 was adequate. 2. The portion of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel relating to Plaintiff's Request for Production No. 9 (Doc. 41-2) is DENI
Summary: ORDER JOHN JOHNSTON , Magistrate Judge . The Court conducted a hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery on January 17, 2018. For the reasons stated in open court, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The portion of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel relating to Plaintiff's Interrogatory No.1 (Doc. 41-1) is DENIED. Defendant Big Sky Resort's response to Interrogatory No. 1 was adequate. 2. The portion of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel relating to Plaintiff's Request for Production No. 9 (Doc. 41-2) is DENIE..
More
ORDER
JOHN JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge.
The Court conducted a hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery on January 17, 2018. For the reasons stated in open court,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The portion of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel relating to Plaintiff's Interrogatory No.1 (Doc. 41-1) is DENIED. Defendant Big Sky Resort's response to Interrogatory No. 1 was adequate.
2. The portion of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel relating to Plaintiff's Request for Production No. 9 (Doc. 41-2) is DENIED, subject to the condition that Defendant Big Sky Resort will supplement its response to Request for Production No. 9 in the manner described in open court.
3. Each party shall bear his of its own attorney's fees and costs with respect to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery.
Source: Leagle
