Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROBERT BOSCH, LLC. v. NINGBO XINHAI AIDUO AUTOMOBILE WIPER BLADE MANUFACTORY CO., LTD., 2:14-cv-01855-LDG (CWH). (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150605c09 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . The matter came before the Court on the Motion for Default Judgment (#10) filed by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC ("Bosch") against Defendant Ningbo Xinhai Aiduo Automobile Wiper Blade Manufactory Co., Ltd.("Aiduo"). As the Court has granted the motion, therefore THE COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that Default Judgment is entered against Aiduo and in favor of Bosch. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that (1) Aiduo has infringed one or more of the claims of the
More

ORDER

The matter came before the Court on the Motion for Default Judgment (#10) filed by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC ("Bosch") against Defendant Ningbo Xinhai Aiduo Automobile Wiper Blade Manufactory Co., Ltd.("Aiduo"). As the Court has granted the motion, therefore

THE COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that Default Judgment is entered against Aiduo and in favor of Bosch.

THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that

(1) Aiduo has infringed one or more of the claims of the United States Patents Nos. 6,292,974; 6,553,607; 6,675,434; 6,836,926; and 6,944,905 by using, selling, offering for sale in the United States, and importing into the United States its wiper blade products model Nos. AD-741 and AD-777, in violation of the patent laws of the United States; (2) Aiduo is permanently enjoined, along with its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and those persons inprivity, active concert or participation with them, from making, using, selling, offering for sale in the United States, or importing into the United States, for the remaining terms of the 6,292,974; 6,553,607; 6,675,434; 6,836,926; and 6,944,905 patents, any wiper blade products infringing any of these patents, including, without limitation, the wiper blade products model Nos. AD-741 and AD-777, and any wiper products that are a mere colorable variation of the same; (3) The Court retains jurisdiction over the parties to the extent necessary to enforce the terms of this default judgment and the injunctive relief provided herein.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer