WHITTINGTON v. NORMAND, 16-1702. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20170208c81
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2017
Summary: ORDER CARL BARBIER , District Judge . The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Partial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the objection to the Magistrate Judge's Partial Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 36), and the opposition thereto (Rec. Doc. 37), hereby OVERRULES Plaintiff's objection and approves the Partial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this mat
Summary: ORDER CARL BARBIER , District Judge . The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Partial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the objection to the Magistrate Judge's Partial Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 36), and the opposition thereto (Rec. Doc. 37), hereby OVERRULES Plaintiff's objection and approves the Partial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matt..
More
ORDER
CARL BARBIER, District Judge.
The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Partial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the objection to the Magistrate Judge's Partial Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 36), and the opposition thereto (Rec. Doc. 37), hereby OVERRULES Plaintiff's objection and approves the Partial Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion filed by Correcthealth Jefferson, LCC, (Rec. Doc. 19), is GRANTED and that the claims against that defendant are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that plaintiff's claims against the State of Louisiana are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment for lack of jurisdiction.
FootNotes
1. This Order does not affect Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Rec. Doc. 39), which the Magistrate Judge will address in due course.
Source: Leagle
