Temple v. C R Bard Inc., CV 19-91-BLG-SPW-TJC. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20200304c09
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Paulette Temple ("Temple") moves for the admission of Kristi Wood to practice before this Court in this case with Ben T. Sather to act as local counsel. (Doc. 25.) Pro hac vice admission is governed by D. Mont. L.R. 83.1(d), which provides in pertinent part that the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission must file an affidavit attesting to various items enumerated at L.R. 83.1(d)(3). While Temple's motion contains Ms. Wood's affidav
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. CAVAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Paulette Temple ("Temple") moves for the admission of Kristi Wood to practice before this Court in this case with Ben T. Sather to act as local counsel. (Doc. 25.) Pro hac vice admission is governed by D. Mont. L.R. 83.1(d), which provides in pertinent part that the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission must file an affidavit attesting to various items enumerated at L.R. 83.1(d)(3). While Temple's motion contains Ms. Wood's affidavi..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. CAVAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Paulette Temple ("Temple") moves for the admission of Kristi Wood to practice before this Court in this case with Ben T. Sather to act as local counsel. (Doc. 25.)
Pro hac vice admission is governed by D. Mont. L.R. 83.1(d), which provides in pertinent part that the attorney seeking pro hac vice admission must file an affidavit attesting to various items enumerated at L.R. 83.1(d)(3). While Temple's motion contains Ms. Wood's affidavit, the affidavit fails to address L.R. 83.1(d)(3)(H). (See Doc. 25-1.)
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Temple's motion to admit Ms. Wood pro hac vice is DENIED without prejudice. Temple may resubmit the motion, provided it is accompanied by an affidavit that complies in full with L.R. 83.1(d)(3).
Source: Leagle
