Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. TREMBLY, 4:14CR3040. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20140425872 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge. Defendant has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (filing no. 17), because the defendant and defense counsel need additional time to fully review the voluminous discovery received before deciding if pretrial motions should be filed. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (fi
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (filing no. 17), because the defendant and defense counsel need additional time to fully review the voluminous discovery received before deciding if pretrial motions should be filed. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 17), is granted. 2) Pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before July 28, 2014. 3) The status conference set for May 6, 2014 is canceled. 4) The jury trial of this case is set to commence before Richard G. Kopf, Senior United States District Judge, in Courtroom 1, United States Courthouse, Lincoln, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on August 11, 2014, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called, for a duration of seven (7) trial days. Jury selection will be held at the commencement of trial. 5) The ends of justice served by granting the motion to continue outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between today's date and July 28, 2014, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because although counsel have diligently worked on this case, additional time is needed to adequately prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer