Elawyers Elawyers
Illinois| Change

Huffman v. Berryhill, 4:18-CV-1710 PLC. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri Number: infdco20190418c93 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PATRICIA L. COHEN , Magistrate Judge . This case is before the Court on Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill's motion to reverse the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) and remand the case to Defendant pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). [ECF No. 13] Plaintiff responded, stating "no objection" to Defendant's motion to reverse and remand. [ECF No. 14] On October 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant's decision that Plaintiff w
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This case is before the Court on Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill's motion to reverse the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) and remand the case to Defendant pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). [ECF No. 13] Plaintiff responded, stating "no objection" to Defendant's motion to reverse and remand. [ECF No. 14]

On October 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant's decision that Plaintiff was not under a disability within the meaning of the Social Security Act. [ECF No. 1] Defendant filed her answer and a transcript of the administrative proceedings. [ECF Nos. 6, 7] Plaintiff filed a brief in support of the complaint, as well as a statement of uncontroverted material facts. [ECF Nos. 8, 8-1]

On April 9, 2019, Defendant filed the instant motion to reverse and remand the case to Defendant for further action under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), which permits the Court to "enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing." 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Defendant represents that, in preparing the brief in support of Defendant's answer, agency counsel determined that "remand was necessary for further evaluation of Plaintiff's claim." [ECF No. 13] Defendant states: "On remand, the Commissioner will obtain additionally testimony from a vocational expert and resolve any apparent conflicts regarding Plaintiff's ability to reach and the demands of jobs in the U.S. Dept. of Labor's Dictionary of Occupational Titles consistent with Social Security Ruling 00-4p[.]" [Id.]

Based on the record, the Court grants Defendant's unopposed motion to reverse the ALJ's decision and remand this matter to Defendant for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's unopposed motion to reverse and remand [ECF No. 13] is GRANTED.

A separate judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer