Filed: Feb. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2020
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REMAINING BRIEFING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Nevada Collectors Association ("NCA"), by and through its counsel of record, Patrick J. Reilly, Esq. and Marckia L. Hayes, Esq., of the law firm of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, Defendant Justice Court of Las Vegas Township ("Justice Court"), by and through its couns
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REMAINING BRIEFING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Nevada Collectors Association ("NCA"), by and through its counsel of record, Patrick J. Reilly, Esq. and Marckia L. Hayes, Esq., of the law firm of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, Defendant Justice Court of Las Vegas Township ("Justice Court"), by and through its counse..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING REMAINING BRIEFING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
(First Request)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff Nevada Collectors Association ("NCA"), by and through its counsel of record, Patrick J. Reilly, Esq. and Marckia L. Hayes, Esq., of the law firm of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, Defendant Justice Court of Las Vegas Township ("Justice Court"), by and through its counsel of record, Thomas D. Dillard, Jr., Esq., of the law firm Olson, Cannon, Gormley & Stoberski, and Defendant State of Nevada, Department of Business and Industry Financial Institutions Division ("FID"), by and through its counsel of record, Aaron D. Ford, Esq., Nevada Attorney General, and Vivienne Rakowsky, Esq., Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. On January 24, 2020, Plaintiff filed its Application for Temporary Restraining Order (the "Application") (ECF No. 11) and Motion for Preliminary Injunction or, Alternatively, for a Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition (the "Motion") (ECF No. 12).
2. On January 30, 2020, this Court denied the Application, but directed the parties to complete briefing on the Motion. See ECF No. 13.
3. On February 5, 2020, Defendant Justice Court filed its response to the Motion. ECF No. 17.
4. On February 6, 2020, Defendant FID filed its response to the Motion. ECF No. 18.
5. Plaintiff's replies are currently due on February 12, 2020, and February 13, 2020, respectively.
6. Plaintiff intends to file a combined reply memorandum in response to Defendants' response briefs on February 13, 2020, which effectively entails a one day extension of time to reply to the opposition brief filed by Justice Court. Defendants have agreed to grant such request.
7. This stipulation is brought in good faith by all parties and not for purposes of delay. This extension will not result in any undue delay in the administration of this case.
8. This is the first requests for extension of time requested by Plaintiff with respect to the replies.
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED by and among the parties that the deadline for Plaintiff to file its replies in support of the Motion is February 13, 2020.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
