CAMPISE v. SOUTHLAND IMPORTS, INC., 350 S.W.3d 861 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco120124000177
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 18, 2011
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2011
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Jack Campise ("Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court's dismissal granted in favor of Southland Imports, Inc., d/b/a Suntrup Volkswagen ("Suntrap"), on his suit alleging violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act ("MMPA"), Sections 407.010-.309 RSMo 2000, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a wr
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Jack Campise ("Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court's dismissal granted in favor of Southland Imports, Inc., d/b/a Suntrup Volkswagen ("Suntrap"), on his suit alleging violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act ("MMPA"), Sections 407.010-.309 RSMo 2000, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a wri..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jack Campise ("Plaintiff) appeals from the trial court's dismissal granted in favor of Southland Imports, Inc., d/b/a Suntrup Volkswagen ("Suntrap"), on his suit alleging violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act ("MMPA"), Sections 407.010-.309 RSMo 2000, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent misrepresentation.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
