HAAS v. MCGRATH, 513 S.W.3d 386 (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco170907004081
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . Michael J. Haas appeals from the trial court's Order and Judgment ("Judgment") granting a motion for directed verdict for Thomas W. McGrath, sued individually and in his capacity as trustee, and entering Judgment in his favor. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Judgment was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM . Michael J. Haas appeals from the trial court's Order and Judgment ("Judgment") granting a motion for directed verdict for Thomas W. McGrath, sued individually and in his capacity as trustee, and entering Judgment in his favor. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Judgment was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum ..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Michael J. Haas appeals from the trial court's Order and Judgment ("Judgment") granting a motion for directed verdict for Thomas W. McGrath, sued individually and in his capacity as trustee, and entering Judgment in his favor.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The evidence in support of the Judgment was not insufficient. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
