U.S. v. PARTIDA, 8:11CR422. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120529815
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 25, 2012
Latest Update: May 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Alejandro Partida (Partida) for an extension of the pretrial motion deadline (Filing No. 21). The motion does not comply with NECrimR 12.1 (a) and paragraph 9 of the Progression Order (Filing No. 13) in that the motion is not accompanied by the defendant's affidavit or declaration stating that defendant: (1) Has been advised by counsel of the reasons for seeking a continuance; (2) Understand
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Alejandro Partida (Partida) for an extension of the pretrial motion deadline (Filing No. 21). The motion does not comply with NECrimR 12.1 (a) and paragraph 9 of the Progression Order (Filing No. 13) in that the motion is not accompanied by the defendant's affidavit or declaration stating that defendant: (1) Has been advised by counsel of the reasons for seeking a continuance; (2) Understands..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendant Alejandro Partida (Partida) for an extension of the pretrial motion deadline (Filing No. 21). The motion does not comply with NECrimR 12.1 (a) and paragraph 9 of the Progression Order (Filing No. 13) in that the motion is not accompanied by the defendant's affidavit or declaration stating that defendant:
(1) Has been advised by counsel of the reasons for seeking a continuance;
(2) Understands that the time sought by the extension may be excluded from any calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq.; and
(3) With this understanding and knowledge, agrees to the filing of the motion.
Accordingly, the motion (Filing No. 21) is:
( X ) Held in abeyance pending compliance with NECrimR 12.1(a) and Paragraph 9 of the Progression Order. Absent compliance on or before June 1, 2012, the motion will be deemed withdrawn and termed on the docket.
( ) Denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
