Spillett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 2:18-cv-0674-GMN-VCF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190614a53
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FIRST REQUEST GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline to file Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-captioned case fourteen days (14) days, up to and including
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FIRST REQUEST GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline to file Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-captioned case fourteen days (14) days, up to and including ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FIRST REQUEST
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
Pursuant to LR 6-1 and LR 26-4, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline to file Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment in the above-captioned case fourteen days (14) days, up to and including June 25, 2019.
This Request for an extension of time is sought in good faith and not for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay. This request for extension is based upon the following:
As the briefing in this matter is extensive, along with voluminous exhibits, counsel for State Farm requires additional time to prepare State Farm's Reply in support of its Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Counsel for State Farm provided extensions for Plaintiff's counsel to submit Plaintiff's Response, in recognition of the extensive briefing. The Court granted those extensions (ECF Nos. 39 and 44). Counsel for State Farm similarly requires additional time.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the time for the Defendants to file their Reply in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by fourteen (14) days from the current deadline of June 11, 2019 up to and including June 25, 2019.
DATED this 5th day of June, 2019. DATED this 5th day of June, 2019.
BOWEN LAW OFFICES LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD SMITH LLP
JEROME R. BOWEN, ESQ. ROBERT W. FREEMAN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 04540 Nevada Bar No. 03062
BRANDON J. TROUT, ESQ. PAMELA L. MCGAHA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 13411 Nevada Bar No. 08181
9960 W. Cheyenne Avenue CHERYL A. GRAMES, ESQ.
Suite 250 Nevada Bar No. 12752
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
Attorneys for Plaintiff Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Shane Spillett Attorneys for Defendant State Farm Mutual
Automobile Insurance Company
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
