U.S. v. ECKERT, 8:14CR67. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20140912a80
Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [23] due to the fact that defendant is needed to help with harvest and counsel has a conflict with November dates. The court finds good cause being shown and the trial shall be continued. The defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial [23] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for October 14, 2014 is
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [23] due to the fact that defendant is needed to help with harvest and counsel has a conflict with November dates. The court finds good cause being shown and the trial shall be continued. The defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a). IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial [23] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for October 14, 2014 is c..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed motion to continue trial [23] due to the fact that defendant is needed to help with harvest and counsel has a conflict with November dates. The court finds good cause being shown and the trial shall be continued. The defendant has previously complied with NECrimR 12.1(a).
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to continue trial [23] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for October 14, 2014 is continued to December 2, 2014.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and October 14, 2014, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
