Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. BTK PROPERTIES LLC, 2:16-cv-01558. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160923f25 Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and Defendant La Paloma Homeowners Association ("La Paloma") by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate as follows: 1. The parties agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file their response to La Paloma's Motion to Dismiss to October 5, 2016. 2. The parties agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file their response to La Paloma's Moti
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE

Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. (hereinafter "Plaintiff") and Defendant La Paloma Homeowners Association ("La Paloma") by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:

1. The parties agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file their response to La Paloma's Motion to Dismiss to October 5, 2016.

2. The parties agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file their response to La Paloma's Motion to Dismiss filed on August 31, 2016 [ECF No. 16] due to Plaintiff's counsel's calendaring conflicts.

This is the parties' first request for extension of these deadlines, and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED:

1. The date for Plaintiff to file their response to La Paloma's Motion to Dismiss is extended to October 5, 2016.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer