U.S. v. Grant, 8:18CR36. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180613e79
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the unopposed Motion for Continuance of Trial by Defendant Tareah Grant [50]. Counsel and the government are engaged in plea negotiations. Counsel is seeking additional time to finalize negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed Motion for Continuance of Trial by Defendant Tareah Grant [50] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 12, 2018, is continued to July 24, 20
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the unopposed Motion for Continuance of Trial by Defendant Tareah Grant [50]. Counsel and the government are engaged in plea negotiations. Counsel is seeking additional time to finalize negotiations. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed Motion for Continuance of Trial by Defendant Tareah Grant [50] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 12, 2018, is continued to July 24, 201..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the unopposed Motion for Continuance of Trial by Defendant Tareah Grant [50]. Counsel and the government are engaged in plea negotiations. Counsel is seeking additional time to finalize negotiations. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the unopposed Motion for Continuance of Trial by Defendant Tareah Grant [50] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for June 12, 2018, is continued to July 24, 2018.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and July 24, 2018, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
