SWISHER v. COLOGNA, 2:15-cv-01138-MMD-GWF. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160104651
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OF THE DATE SET FOR DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY MARSHAL'S OFFICE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . COME NOW, the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record and hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant Clark County Marshal's Office to file a response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint be extended from December 30, 2015, up to and including January 25, 2
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OF THE DATE SET FOR DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY MARSHAL'S OFFICE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . COME NOW, the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record and hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant Clark County Marshal's Office to file a response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint be extended from December 30, 2015, up to and including January 25, 20..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OF THE DATE SET FOR DEFENDANT CLARK COUNTY MARSHAL'S OFFICE TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
[FIRST REQUEST]
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
COME NOW, the parties, through their undersigned counsel of record and hereby stipulate and agree that the time for Defendant Clark County Marshal's Office to file a response to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint be extended from December 30, 2015, up to and including January 25, 2016.
Reason for Extension
Defendant Clark County Marshal's Office1 requests additional time to review Plaintiff's claims and allegations in the First Amended Complaint and conduct an investigation of these matters prior to filing a response to the First Amended Complaint. In addition, the Office of the Attorney General, will be reviewing requests for representation tendered by former members of the Marshals Division, Defendants Cologna and Hansen, in conjunction with this investigation. Accordingly, this stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. This is the first request for an extension of this deadline.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
FootNotes
1. Defendant Clark County Marshal's Office is more appropriately identified as Marshals Division.
Source: Leagle
