Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Caro v. Louis Vuitton USA, Inc., 2:17-cv-03030-GMN-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180202f61 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Third Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to L.R. 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, Plaintiff Judith Caro ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Louis Vuitton USA, Inc. and Louis Vuitton North America, Inc. ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel hereby stipulate and agree to further extend the time for Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint, f
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(Third Request)

Pursuant to L.R. 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, Plaintiff Judith Caro ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Louis Vuitton USA, Inc. and Louis Vuitton North America, Inc. ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel hereby stipulate and agree to further extend the time for Defendants to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint, from February 1, 2018 to February 22, 2018. The parties are engaged in settlement discussions in an effort to resolve this matter before proceeding to arbitration.

This is the Parties' third stipulation to extend the time for Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. This requested extension of time is sought in good faith and not for purposes of causing any undue delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer