Petersen v. Bitters, 8:16CV183. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180117b14
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. ROSSITER, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendant John L. Henry's Objection to Order 149 (Filing No. 152) which the Court construes as a Motion to Reconsider the Court's January 2, 2018, Order (Filing No. 149) denying Henry's Objection to Magistrate's Judge's Order (Filing No. 139). On January 2, 2018, after Filing No. 149 was docketed, the Court received Henry's Response (Filing No. 150) and construed it as a separate objection to the Magistrate
Summary: ORDER ROBERT F. ROSSITER, JR. , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on defendant John L. Henry's Objection to Order 149 (Filing No. 152) which the Court construes as a Motion to Reconsider the Court's January 2, 2018, Order (Filing No. 149) denying Henry's Objection to Magistrate's Judge's Order (Filing No. 139). On January 2, 2018, after Filing No. 149 was docketed, the Court received Henry's Response (Filing No. 150) and construed it as a separate objection to the Magistrate J..
More
ORDER
ROBERT F. ROSSITER, JR., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant John L. Henry's Objection to Order 149 (Filing No. 152) which the Court construes as a Motion to Reconsider the Court's January 2, 2018, Order (Filing No. 149) denying Henry's Objection to Magistrate's Judge's Order (Filing No. 139). On January 2, 2018, after Filing No. 149 was docketed, the Court received Henry's Response (Filing No. 150) and construed it as a separate objection to the Magistrate Judge's Order. Each of Henry's objections was individually considered and overruled, and he was not prejudiced in any way by Filing No. 149. Accordingly, Henry's Motion to Reconsider is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
