U.S. v. GORDON, 4:17CR3004. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20170830b31
Filed: Aug. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2017
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved for a review of the detention order and requests a hearing. (Filing No. 221). Under 18 U.S.C. 3142(f) the magistrate judge may review detention only if "information exists that was not known to the movant at the time of the hearing and that has a material bearing" on the amelioration of the risks of nonappearance and safety. Motions for review of detention must specify the factual basis for the motion, the materiality of the f
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved for a review of the detention order and requests a hearing. (Filing No. 221). Under 18 U.S.C. 3142(f) the magistrate judge may review detention only if "information exists that was not known to the movant at the time of the hearing and that has a material bearing" on the amelioration of the risks of nonappearance and safety. Motions for review of detention must specify the factual basis for the motion, the materiality of the fa..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant has moved for a review of the detention order and requests a hearing. (Filing No. 221). Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) the magistrate judge may review detention only if "information exists that was not known to the movant at the time of the hearing and that has a material bearing" on the amelioration of the risks of nonappearance and safety. Motions for review of detention must specify the factual basis for the motion, the materiality of the facts to the issues, and that the information was not known previously. Defendant's motion does not include this requisite information.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's motion to review detention, (Filing No. 221), is denied without prejudice to re-filing, if appropriate, in accordance with the requirements described in this order.
Source: Leagle
