Filed: May 24, 2018
Latest Update: May 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 37, 38, 39) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On May 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed three notices of issuance of subpoena duces tecum. Docket Nos. 37, 38, 39. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered by the Court in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Docket Nos. 37, 38, 39, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents
Summary: ORDER (Docket Nos. 37, 38, 39) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . On May 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed three notices of issuance of subpoena duces tecum. Docket Nos. 37, 38, 39. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered by the Court in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Docket Nos. 37, 38, 39, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents ..
More
ORDER
(Docket Nos. 37, 38, 39)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
On May 23, 2018, Plaintiff filed three notices of issuance of subpoena duces tecum. Docket Nos. 37, 38, 39. Discovery-related documents should not be filed unless ordered by the Court. See Local Rule 26-8; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1). No such order has been entered by the Court in this case. Accordingly, the Court STRIKES Docket Nos. 37, 38, 39, and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
