DOLL CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, 8:15CV68. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150402924
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's, Doll Construction, LLC, Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Filing No. 22). The plaintiff seeks to extend its response time to the motions to dismiss until after resolution of the plaintiff's motion to remand (Filing No. 16). The defendants' motions to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion to remand are related. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for an
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's, Doll Construction, LLC, Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Filing No. 22). The plaintiff seeks to extend its response time to the motions to dismiss until after resolution of the plaintiff's motion to remand (Filing No. 16). The defendants' motions to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion to remand are related. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for an ..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiff's, Doll Construction, LLC, Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Filing No. 22). The plaintiff seeks to extend its response time to the motions to dismiss until after resolution of the plaintiff's motion to remand (Filing No. 16). The defendants' motions to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion to remand are related. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for an extension is denied. The plaintiff shall have until April 6, 2015, to respond to the motions to dismiss. The defendants may have until April 16, 2015, to reply.
IT IS ORDERED:
The plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Filing No. 22) is denied.
Source: Leagle
