Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Shapiro v. Treasure Island, LLC, 2:17-cv-02930-APG-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180126j20 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE (First Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Kerri Shapiro ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Treasure Island, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a Treasure Island Hotel & Casino and Ruffin Acquisition, LLC, a limited liability company (both Defendants collectively as "Treasure Island"), by and through their respective counsel of reco
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

(First Request)

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Kerri Shapiro ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Treasure Island, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a Treasure Island Hotel & Casino and Ruffin Acquisition, LLC, a limited liability company (both Defendants collectively as "Treasure Island"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

1. Plaintiff filed her Complaint in this matter on November 22, 2017;

2. Plaintiff filed a Motion to Consolidate Cases (ECF No. 5) on or about November 30, 2017;

3. Treasure Island's responsive pleading to the Complaint is currently due on January 30, 2018;

4. Treasure Island's deadline to file a Response to the Motion to Consolidate Cases (ECF No. 5) was December 14, 2017, which was prior to Treasure Island being served in this action;

5. Plaintiff and Treasure Island agree that Treasure Island shall have up to and until February 14, 2018 to file and serve a responsive pleading in this matter;

6. Plaintiff and Treasure Island agree that Treasure Island shall have up to and including February 14, 2018 to file and serve a Response to the Motion to Consolidate Cases (ECF No. 5);

7. The purpose of the extension is that this case involves class-wide allegations under the Internet Tax Freedom Act, and additional time is required to fully investigate and respond;

8. This stipulation and order is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer