Filed: Sep. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE ALL EVIDENCE FROM PLAINTIFFS' EXPERTS, THE EMPLOYMENT RESEARCH CORPORATION, MALCOLM COHEN AND LAURA STEINER (Second Request) AND ORDER THEREON MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Defendant, STATE OF NEVADA, EX REL. ITS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ("NDOC") and Plaintiffs, DONALD WALDEN, JR., NATHAN ECHEVERRIA, AARON DICUS, BRENT EVERIST, TRAVIS ZUFELT, TIMOTHY RIDENOUR and DANIEL TRACY,
Summary: STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE ALL EVIDENCE FROM PLAINTIFFS' EXPERTS, THE EMPLOYMENT RESEARCH CORPORATION, MALCOLM COHEN AND LAURA STEINER (Second Request) AND ORDER THEREON MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Defendant, STATE OF NEVADA, EX REL. ITS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ("NDOC") and Plaintiffs, DONALD WALDEN, JR., NATHAN ECHEVERRIA, AARON DICUS, BRENT EVERIST, TRAVIS ZUFELT, TIMOTHY RIDENOUR and DANIEL TRACY, ..
More
STIPULATION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE ALL EVIDENCE FROM PLAINTIFFS' EXPERTS, THE EMPLOYMENT RESEARCH CORPORATION, MALCOLM COHEN AND LAURA STEINER
(Second Request)
AND ORDER THEREON
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Defendant, STATE OF NEVADA, EX REL. ITS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ("NDOC") and Plaintiffs, DONALD WALDEN, JR., NATHAN ECHEVERRIA, AARON DICUS, BRENT EVERIST, TRAVIS ZUFELT, TIMOTHY RIDENOUR and DANIEL TRACY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated (collectively, "The Parties") by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendant, NDOC to file its Reply in Support of Motion to Exclude All Evidence From Plaintiffs' Experts, The Employment Research Corporation, Malcolm Cohen and Laura Steiner (ECF No. 189) from September 5, 2018 up to and including September 12, 2018.
Defendant is requesting this extension due to counsels' professional commitments and existing workload.
This stipulation is made in good faith and is not for purpose of undue burden or delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
