Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jackson v. City of Las Vegas, 2:14-CV-01794. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180618969 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE HEARING CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, Michael D. Jackson hereinafter ("Jackson") by and through their attorney, Jenny L. Foley, Ph.D., Esq., of the law firm of HKM Employment Attorneys LLP, and Defendants, CITY OF LAS VEGAS; STEVE SMITH, an individual; MAUREEN HIGGINS-TEAGUE, an individual; DOE Defendants Through X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS A through Z, inclusive ("Defendants"), by and through their attorney, Jack O. Esli
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE HEARING

COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, Michael D. Jackson hereinafter ("Jackson") by and through their attorney, Jenny L. Foley, Ph.D., Esq., of the law firm of HKM Employment Attorneys LLP, and Defendants, CITY OF LAS VEGAS; STEVE SMITH, an individual; MAUREEN HIGGINS-TEAGUE, an individual; DOE Defendants Through X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS A through Z, inclusive ("Defendants"), by and through their attorney, Jack O. Eslinger, Esq. of the Las Vegas City Attorney's Office and hereby stipulate as follows:

1. That the parties have reached an agreement to settle regarding the issues set forth in Plaintiffs' Complaint.

2. That the Settlement Conference scheduled for Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. be vacated due to a settlement being reached.

3. The substantive terms of the settlement are as follows:

a. Defense counsel will provide a settlement agreement with the terms set forth to Plaintiff's counsel in the next 14 days. b. The parties aver and agree that the settlement in this matter resolves a bona fide dispute. c. The parties aver and agree that the settlement was reached after contested litigation.

The Court shall maintain continuing jurisdiction of this matter for all disputes which arise from the settlement.

This request for the Court's approval and judgment is made in good faith.

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing proposed Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. That the parties have settled all claims raised in Plaintiffs' Complaint. 2. That the Settlement Conference scheduled for Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 11:30 a.m. is vacated due to a settlement being reached. 3. The substantive terms of the settlement are as follows: a. Defense counsel will provide a settlement agreement with the terms set forth to Plaintiff's counsel in the next 14 days. b. The settlement in this matter resolves a bona fide dispute. c. The settlement was reached after contested litigation.

The Court shall maintain continuing jurisdiction of this matter until the stipulation and order of dismissal is filed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the proposed stipulation.

and order for dismissal must be filed on or before July 30, 2018. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a status check is scheduled for 11:00 AM, August 3, 2018, in Courtroom.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer