Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roberson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 17-cv-13166. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20191114978 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHALEN'S SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (ECF NO. 37) AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE HIS VERSION OF A "SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT" OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO SET-ASIDE SETTLEMENT (ECF NO. 24) PAUL D. BORMAN , District Judge . On September 25, 2019, Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation to deny Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce "Settlement Agreement" or in the Alternative t
More

ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHALEN'S SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (ECF NO. 37) AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE HIS VERSION OF A "SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT" OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO SET-ASIDE SETTLEMENT (ECF NO. 24)

On September 25, 2019, Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen issued a Report and Recommendation to deny Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce "Settlement Agreement" or in the Alternative to Set-Aside Settlement. (ECF No. 37, Report and Recommendation.)

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from any party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L. R. 72.1(d), the Court ORDERS that:

(1) Magistrate Judge Whalen'sSeptember 25, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 37) is ADOPTED; and

(2) Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce "Settlement Agreement" or in the Alternative to Set-Aside Settlement (ECF No. 24) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer