Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Emhof v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, 2:14-cv-02134-LDG-GWF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170421a90 Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO REPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . All parties hereby stipulate to extending Plaintiff's time to file a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by 14 days, up until and including April 13, 2017. Good cause exists for the request: Plaintiff's counsel had a baby girl in early February. She was diagnosed with a rare cardiac condition and underwent open heart surgery last week. She
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO REPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

All parties hereby stipulate to extending Plaintiff's time to file a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by 14 days, up until and including April 13, 2017. Good cause exists for the request:

Plaintiff's counsel had a baby girl in early February. She was diagnosed with a rare cardiac condition and underwent open heart surgery last week. She will be in intensive recovery for approximately two months, and normal recovery for another four. There is a very real possibility she will undergo a second operation in the near future. Plaintiff's counsel has been and will continue to be in the office sporadically so he may care for his daughter.

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation by and between the parties and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have up to and including April 13, 2017 to file his response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer