HUBER v. BACA, 3:14-cv-00083-RCJ-VPC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20141120e51
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. The court directed petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed because it is untimely and successive. Order (#3). Petitioner has not responded within the allotted time, and the court will dismiss the action. Reasonable jurists would not find the court's conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely a
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. The court directed petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed because it is untimely and successive. Order (#3). Petitioner has not responded within the allotted time, and the court will dismiss the action. Reasonable jurists would not find the court's conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely an..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
The court directed petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed because it is untimely and successive. Order (#3). Petitioner has not responded within the allotted time, and the court will dismiss the action.
Reasonable jurists would not find the court's conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the court will not issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely and successive. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
