Filed: Jun. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 05, 2014
Summary: TENTATIVE FINDINGS JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge. The Court has received the presentence investigation report and addendum in this case. There are no objections or motions for departure or variance. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Court will consult and follow the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to the extent permitted and required by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and subsequent cases. In this regard, the Court gives notice that, unless otherwise ordered, it will: (a) give the adv
Summary: TENTATIVE FINDINGS JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge. The Court has received the presentence investigation report and addendum in this case. There are no objections or motions for departure or variance. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Court will consult and follow the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to the extent permitted and required by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and subsequent cases. In this regard, the Court gives notice that, unless otherwise ordered, it will: (a) give the advi..
More
TENTATIVE FINDINGS
JOHN M. GERRARD, District Judge.
The Court has received the presentence investigation report and addendum in this case. There are no objections or motions for departure or variance.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. The Court will consult and follow the Federal Sentencing Guidelines to the extent permitted and required by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and subsequent cases. In this regard, the Court gives notice that, unless otherwise ordered, it will:
(a) give the advisory Guidelines respectful consideration within the context of each individual case and will filter the Guidelines' advice through the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, but will not afford the Guidelines any particular or "substantial" weight;
(b) resolve all factual disputes relevant to sentencing by the greater weight of the evidence and without the aid of a jury;
(c) impose upon the United States the burden of proof on all Guidelines enhancements;
(d) impose upon the defendant the burden of proof on all Guidelines mitigators;
(e) depart from the advisory Guidelines, if appropriate, using pre-Booker departure theory; and
(f) in cases where a departure using pre-Booker departure theory is not warranted, deviate or vary from the Guidelines when there is a principled reason justifying a sentence different than that called for by application of the advisory Guidelines, again without affording the Guidelines any particular or "substantial" weight.
2. There are no objections or motions that require resolution at sentencing. The Court is aware of the amendments to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 that have been adopted by the United States Sentencing Commission and that, absent action of Congress to the contrary, will become effective on November 1, 2014. See Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts, 79 Fed. Reg. 25,996, 26,001-06 (May 6, 2014). The Court is further aware of the defendant's disagreement with the probation officer as to how a two-level reduction to the defendant's offense level, pursuant to those amendments, would be applied. See filing 366. The Court will, sua sponte, inquire and make a determination as to whether and how those amendments should apply in this case.
3. Except to the extent, if any, that the Court has sustained an objection, granted a motion, or reserved an issue for later resolution in the preceding paragraph, the parties are notified that the Court's tentative findings are that the presentence report is correct in all respects.
4. If any party wishes to challenge these tentative findings, that party shall, as soon as possible (but in any event no later than three (3) business days before sentencing) file with the Court and serve upon opposing counsel an objection challenging these tentative findings, supported by a brief as to the law and such evidentiary materials as are required, giving due regard to the local rules of practice governing the submission of evidentiary materials. If an evidentiary hearing is requested, such filings should include a statement describing why a hearing is necessary and how long such a hearing would take.
5. Absent timely submission of the information required by the preceding paragraph, the Court's tentative findings may become final and the presentence report may be relied upon by the Court without more.
6. Unless otherwise ordered, any objection challenging these tentative findings shall be resolved at sentencing.
