Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Robert L. Citroen, Law Corporation v. Micron Optics, Inc., 3:16-cv-000570-RCJ-WGC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180220d42 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MICRON TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CITROEN TO FILE HIS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Robert L. Citroen, and Defendant/Counterclaimant Micron Optics, Inc., jointly request an extension of time to file their respective reply briefs to the two Motions for Summary Judgment, filed on December 6, 20
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MICRON TO FILE ITS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CITROEN TO FILE HIS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Robert L. Citroen, and Defendant/Counterclaimant Micron Optics, Inc., jointly request an extension of time to file their respective reply briefs to the two Motions for Summary Judgment, filed on December 6, 2017 [ECF 73, ECF 76 and ECF 77]. The requested extension to file reply briefs would be through and including Friday, February 8, 2018. This requested extension is due other briefs counsel has due as well as a trial Citroen's counsel has on January 22, 2018. No prior extensions for these replies have been requested.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer