LVBK, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A., 2:18-cv-00676-RFB-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181231968
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY TRIAL ORDER PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . LVBK, LLC ( LVBK ) and Bank of America, N.A. ( BANA ), hereby stipulate and agree to stay the issuance of a trial order in this matter pending resolution of the motion for judgment on the pleadings (the motion ). BANA filed the motion on July 20, 2018 [ECF No. 15], LVBK filed its response on August 13, 2018 [ECF No. 20], and BANA f
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY TRIAL ORDER PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . LVBK, LLC ( LVBK ) and Bank of America, N.A. ( BANA ), hereby stipulate and agree to stay the issuance of a trial order in this matter pending resolution of the motion for judgment on the pleadings (the motion ). BANA filed the motion on July 20, 2018 [ECF No. 15], LVBK filed its response on August 13, 2018 [ECF No. 20], and BANA fi..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY TRIAL ORDER PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
(FIRST REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
LVBK, LLC (LVBK) and Bank of America, N.A. (BANA), hereby stipulate and agree to stay the issuance of a trial order in this matter pending resolution of the motion for judgment on the pleadings (the motion). BANA filed the motion on July 20, 2018 [ECF No. 15], LVBK filed its response on August 13, 2018 [ECF No. 20], and BANA filed its reply on August 31, 2018 [ECF No. 23].
The motion for judgment on the pleadings deals with the threshold legal issue in this matter and likely will result in increased chance of resolution either by being granted or, by greatly increasing the likelihood of settlement if denied. The parties believe that the court should issue this ruling, as it would greatly increase judicial economy in a matter where the law and not facts are largely at issue. This is the parties' first request and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
