Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:16-cv-02779-JCM-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180323f07 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ENTIRE CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules LR IA 6-2 and LR 7-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Defendant Diamond Creek Homeowners' Association ("Diamond Creek") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows: 1. On or about February 9, 201
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ENTIRE CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT

(First Request)

Pursuant to Local Rules LR IA 6-2 and LR 7-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Defendant Diamond Creek Homeowners' Association ("Diamond Creek") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows:

1. On or about February 9, 2018, the Court entered an order extending the discovery deadlines, which set the deadline to complete discovery for March 30, 2018 (ECF No. 50).

2. The Parties have since come to an agreement and are in the process of finalizing settlement.

3. Given the resolution and to avoid wasting resources and incurring potentially unnecessary expense associated with discovery and continued litigation, the Parties agree, and hereby request, a stay of the case to give each side sufficient time and resources to finalize settlement.

4. The Parties make this stipulation in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer