Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Canning v. Creighton University, 4:18 cv-03023. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180808b62 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2018
Summary: PROTECTIVE ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation and motion for a protective order concerning the production of documents by the defendant Creighton University ("the University") (filing 31). The court finds that the parties have stipulated and agreed that: 1. Discovery in this action may involve the production of documents and disclosure of information which the University claims to be confidential; 2. The parties de
More

PROTECTIVE ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties' joint stipulation and motion for a protective order concerning the production of documents by the defendant Creighton University ("the University") (filing 31).

The court finds that the parties have stipulated and agreed that:

1. Discovery in this action may involve the production of documents and disclosure of information which the University claims to be confidential;

2. The parties desire to pursue discovery with a minimum of delay and expense; and

3. The parties have agreed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rules 29 and 26(c) and NELR 7.3 that a protective order should be entered in connection with the production of documents and disclosure of information by the University.

The court finds that the joint motion should be granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND AGREED:

1. When used in this order, the word "documents" has the full extent of its meaning as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and includes all written, recorded or graphic matter whatsoever, in paper or electronic form, including interrogatory answers, requests to admit and responses thereto, documents produced by any party to this action whether pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26, 34, by subpoena duces tecum or by agreement, deposition transcripts and exhibits, and any portion of any Court papers which quote from any of the foregoing.

2. As used in this order, the words "personnel records" means records of current or former residents or other employees of the University.

3. All documents and disclosure of information pertaining to personnel records and every portion thereof, produced by the University, pursuant to any discovery procedure or informal exchange of documents in this matter, shall be considered "confidential" for purposes of this order and shall be used by the non-producing parties, their experts and attorneys, only for the preparation for and conduct of proceedings herein and not for any business or other purpose whatsoever. Documents which were prepared by and obtained from any individual, entity or agency other than the University or a person acting for the University and which would be discoverable from that entity, agency, or person shall not be deemed confidential for purposes of this order.

4. Except as hereinafter provided, no confidential documents or disclosure information, nor any portion or summary thereof, produced by the University shall be given, shown, disclosed, or communicated by the parties in any way, directly or indirectly, to any person or entity other than:

(a) Counsel for the parties in this action, and their employees; (b) The parties; (c) Outside consultants and experts consulted or retained for the purpose of testifying or assisting in the preparation for the conduct of the proceedings herein.

Parties may question potential lay witnesses regarding the underlying facts contained in personnel records so long as subject's names and/or personally identifiable information is not disclosed.

5. Before disclosure of any confidential documents is made to any person described in paragraph 4 above, the person to whom disclosure is made shall be informed of the terms of this order and shall agree in writing to be bound by the terms of this order. Counsel for each party shall maintain a file of such written agreements until this action is concluded.

6. If any party files any confidential documents or disclosure information produced by the University with the Court, or testimony is given concerning disclosure information contained therein, all such documents, testimony and documents incorporating or referring to such disclosure information, shall be filed under seal and shall be maintained under seal of the Court. For the convenience of the parties, the Clerk and the Court, any filing containing both confidential and non-confidential material may be filed entirely under seal.

7. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this order shall be without prejudice to the right of any party to object to the production of any documents, or any testimony, or inspection upon any appropriate grounds and nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of any objection which might be raised as to the admissibility at trial of any evidentiary materials.

8. This order is without prejudice to the right of any party to seek relief from the Court from any of the restrictions provided above upon good cause shown or for other grounds provided by applicable law.

9. Prior to the trial of this action, the attorneys for the parties shall meet and attempt to agree on an appropriate form of order to submit to the Court regarding the confidential status, if any, to be afforded documents, testimony, or other information disclosed during the course of the trial. If the parties cannot agree upon an appropriate form of order, the matter will be submitted to the Court for determination prior to trial under terms and conditions established by the Court.

10. At the conclusion of this action all originals or reproductions of all documents subject to this protective order shall be returned to the producing party upon request, or destroyed by the non-producing parties.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer