Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Keynote Properties, LLC, 2:18-CV-00762-JAD-VCF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180521928
Visitors: 30
Filed: May 18, 2018
Latest Update: May 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT RANCHO SANTA FE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC dba MR. COOPER ("Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record, Melanie D. Morgan, Esq. and Donna M. Wittig, Esq. of the law firm of AKERMAN LLP, and Defendant RANCHO SANTA FE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, M
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT RANCHO SANTA FE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC dba MR. COOPER ("Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record, Melanie D. Morgan, Esq. and Donna M. Wittig, Esq. of the law firm of AKERMAN LLP, and Defendant RANCHO SANTA FE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, Ma..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT RANCHO SANTA FE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION TO FILE RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
(First Request)
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC dba MR. COOPER ("Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record, Melanie D. Morgan, Esq. and Donna M. Wittig, Esq. of the law firm of AKERMAN LLP, and Defendant RANCHO SANTA FE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION ("Defendant"), by and through its counsel of record, Marc S. Cwik, Esq., of the law firm LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP; pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2 and LR 7-1, that the time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint [#1] on file herein is hereby extended to and including Friday, June 1, 2018. Defendant requested this extension to allow sufficient time for investigation of the factual allegations and Plaintiff has agreed to same.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED between the parties that this extension of time does not operate as any admission against interest by Plaintiff concerning the Complaint [#1], nor as a waiver of any defense that Defendant may have with regard to the Complaint [#1], to the Court's jurisdiction over this matter, to the venue of this matter, or to service and service of process.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
