U.S. v. Bartels, 8:19CR101. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190529f35
Visitors: 5
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [42]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 4-week extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by June 21, 2019. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [42] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 21, 2019. 2. The ends of just
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [42]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 4-week extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by June 21, 2019. IT IS ORDERED: 1. Defendant's MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [42] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 21, 2019. 2. The ends of justi..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [42]. For good cause shown, I find that the motion should be granted. Defendant will be given an approximate 4-week extension. Pretrial Motions shall be filed by June 21, 2019.
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's MOTION TO ENLARGE TIME TO FILE PRETRIAL MOTIONS [42] is granted. Pretrial motions shall be filed on or before June 21, 2019.
2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between May 24, 2019, and June 21, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason defendant's counsel required additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).
Source: Leagle
