Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Conley v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Inc, 2:17-CV-02785-JCM-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171219c40 Visitors: 19
Filed: Dec. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORP. TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff TRACEY I. CONLEY ("Plaintiff"), by and through counsel of record, and Defendant NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORP. ("Nissan"), by and through counsel of record, (collectively Plaintiff and Nissan are hereafter referred to as the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Nissan's response to Plaintiff
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORP. TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff TRACEY I. CONLEY ("Plaintiff"), by and through counsel of record, and Defendant NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORP. ("Nissan"), by and through counsel of record, (collectively Plaintiff and Nissan are hereafter referred to as the "Parties") hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Nissan's response to Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. 1] is due December 18, 2017.

2. Nissan requested from Plaintiff an extension of time, up to and including January 16, 2018, to respond to the Complaint, and Plaintiff does not oppose such an extension.

3. The Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Nissan has an extension of time up to and including January 16, 2018 to respond to the Complaint.

4. This request is made in good faith and not made for purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer