Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Strict Scrutiny Media, Co. v. City of Reno, 3:16-cv-00734-MMD-WGC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180622e22 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND [First Request] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . STRICT SCRUTINY MEDIA, CO. ("SSM"), by and through its attorneys of record, and Defendant THE CITY OF RENO ("City" or "Reno"), by and through its attorneys of record, do hereby stipulate and agree that SSM may have an additional time within which to respond to the City's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc#70). Plaintiff's counsel is out of town attending depositions, and is pre
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND [First Request]

STRICT SCRUTINY MEDIA, CO. ("SSM"), by and through its attorneys of record, and Defendant THE CITY OF RENO ("City" or "Reno"), by and through its attorneys of record, do hereby stipulate and agree that SSM may have an additional time within which to respond to the City's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc#70). Plaintiff's counsel is out of town attending depositions, and is preparing for trial the week of June 25, 2018, and is not able to complete the SSM's response within the time currently scheduled.

Therefore, the parties respectfully request an extension to Monday, July 2, 2018, within which to allow SSM to respond to the City's Motion for Summary Judgment. No prejudice will be had by the City if the extension is granted and this extension is not requested for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED, that SSM may have until Monday, July 2, 2018, within which to file its response to the City's Motion for Summary Judgment.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer