Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:16-cv-02230-RFB-VCF. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170221h78 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC TO REPLY TO RESPONSE [DKT 42] TO ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT 38] (First Request for This Brief) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Defendant/Counterclaimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Plaintiff/Counter-defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to allow SFR an additio
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC TO REPLY TO RESPONSE [DKT 42] TO ITS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DKT 38] (First Request for This Brief)

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, and LR 7-1, Defendant/Counterclaimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Plaintiff/Counter-defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to allow SFR an additional two weeks (14 days) to file its Reply to Chase's Response in Opposition to SFR's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Regarding a Pure Issue of Law: Application of the Return Doctrine Post-Bourne Valley ("Chase's Resp. to Partial MSJ.") [Dkt 42]. Specifically, the Parties stipulate to the following:

1. SFR's current date to file a Reply to Chase's Resp. to Partial MSJ is February 15, 2017.

2. The Parties agree that SFR may have a two-week extension such that SFR's Reply to Chase's Resp. to Partial MSJ shall be due on or before March 1, 2017.

3. SFR requests the enlargement of the briefing schedule due to the novel issues raised in the Partial MSJ and Chase's Resp. to Partial MSJ.

4. The briefing schedule was enlarged once for Chase's Resp. to Partial MSJ by stipulation and order entered on January 11, 2017 [Dkt. 41]. This is the first request for an enlargement of time for this brief following Chase's filing of its Resp. to Partial MSJ.

5. The Parties stipulate to the foregoing in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer