Jardine v. Williams, 2:16-cv-02637-RFB-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181227811
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . This is a habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner Jardine has filed a motion for discovery asking this court to issue an order requiring (1) the Clark County District Attorney's Office to provide Jardine's counsel with a complete copy of the discovery it disclosed to trial counsel during the litigation of State v. Jardine, Clark County Case No. C223240; (2) Attorney Conrad Claus to provide counsel with his complete file;
Summary: ORDER RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . This is a habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. 2254. Petitioner Jardine has filed a motion for discovery asking this court to issue an order requiring (1) the Clark County District Attorney's Office to provide Jardine's counsel with a complete copy of the discovery it disclosed to trial counsel during the litigation of State v. Jardine, Clark County Case No. C223240; (2) Attorney Conrad Claus to provide counsel with his complete file; ..
More
ORDER
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
This is a habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner Jardine has filed a motion for discovery asking this court to issue an order requiring (1) the Clark County District Attorney's Office to provide Jardine's counsel with a complete copy of the discovery it disclosed to trial counsel during the litigation of State v. Jardine, Clark County Case No. C223240; (2) Attorney Conrad Claus to provide counsel with his complete file; and (3) Robert Rose, who worked with Claus, to provide counsel with all files he has related to Jardine. ECF No. 22. Respondents have filed a response indicating they do not oppose Jardine's discovery request.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for discovery (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED. Petitioner is permitted to serve subpoenas commanding the production of the specific material identified in his discovery motion.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's amended petition is due by February 4, 2019. In all other respects, the scheduling of this proceeding is governed by the court's order of January 8, 2018 (ECF No. 14).
Source: Leagle
