Filed: Jan. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN , District Judge . In a Report and Recommendation dated December 6, 2017, the Honorable Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that motions to dismiss of Barr Engineering Co., Barr Engineering Company General Welfare Wrap Plan, and PayFlex System USA, Inc., be granted. Candice Howe objected, and the moving defendants responded. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (2012). Based on that review, the Co
Summary: ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN , District Judge . In a Report and Recommendation dated December 6, 2017, the Honorable Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that motions to dismiss of Barr Engineering Co., Barr Engineering Company General Welfare Wrap Plan, and PayFlex System USA, Inc., be granted. Candice Howe objected, and the moving defendants responded. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (2012). Based on that review, the Cou..
More
ORDER
JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.
In a Report and Recommendation dated December 6, 2017, the Honorable Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that motions to dismiss of Barr Engineering Co., Barr Engineering Company General Welfare Wrap Plan, and PayFlex System USA, Inc., be granted. Candice Howe objected, and the moving defendants responded. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2012). Based on that review, the Court overrules Howe's objection and accepts the recommended disposition [Docket No. 49]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Barr Engineering Co. and Barr Engineering Company General Welfare Wrap Plan's motion to dismiss [Docket No. 29] is GRANTED.
2. PayFlex System USA, Inc.'s motion to dismiss [Docket No. 35] is GRANTED.
3. As to Barr Engineering Co., Barr Engineering Company General Welfare Wrap Plan, and PayFlex System USA, Inc., the action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
