LEE v. WALMAN OPTICAL COMPANY, 8:14CV272. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150708c90
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . The parties intend to move for summary judgment. At their request, the deadline for that motion was continued such that the court needs to move the trial and pretrial conference dates in order to fully consider any motions filed. Accordingly. IT IS ORDERED that the pretrial conference and jury trial are continued pending further order of the court. If this case is not fully resolved by summary judgment, within ten (10) days after the summary judg
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . The parties intend to move for summary judgment. At their request, the deadline for that motion was continued such that the court needs to move the trial and pretrial conference dates in order to fully consider any motions filed. Accordingly. IT IS ORDERED that the pretrial conference and jury trial are continued pending further order of the court. If this case is not fully resolved by summary judgment, within ten (10) days after the summary judgm..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
The parties intend to move for summary judgment. At their request, the deadline for that motion was continued such that the court needs to move the trial and pretrial conference dates in order to fully consider any motions filed.
Accordingly.
IT IS ORDERED that the pretrial conference and jury trial are continued pending further order of the court. If this case is not fully resolved by summary judgment, within ten (10) days after the summary judgment ruling, the parties shall contact the undersigned magistrate judge's chambers to re-schedule the pretrial conference and trial.
Source: Leagle
