Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Amarillas-Salazar, 2:18-cr-00028-RFB-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180503i15 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 02, 2018
Latest Update: May 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Counsel for Defense (ECF No. 36). Mace J. Yampolsky, Esq. was appointed as counsel of record for Amarillas-Salazar. (ECF No. 5). On April 19, 2018, Defendant Amarillas-Salazar filed the instant motion on his own behalf. (ECF No.36). Pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-6(a), "[a] party who has appeared by attorney cannot while so represented appear or act in the case. This means that once an attorney makes an appea
More

ORDER

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Counsel for Defense (ECF No. 36).

Mace J. Yampolsky, Esq. was appointed as counsel of record for Amarillas-Salazar. (ECF No. 5). On April 19, 2018, Defendant Amarillas-Salazar filed the instant motion on his own behalf. (ECF No.36).

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 11-6(a), "[a] party who has appeared by attorney cannot while so represented appear or act in the case. This means that once an attorney makes an appearance on behalf of a party, that party may not personally file a document with the court; all filings must thereafter be made by the attorney." Defendant may not file motions on his own behalf. See Local Rule IA 11-6(a).

Accordingly,

The Clerk of Court is directed to STRIKE the Motion to Dismiss Counsel for Defense (ECF No. 36) from the docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer