Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fisher v. MJ Christensen Jewelers, LLC, 2:15-cv-00358-RFB-NJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20161229c15 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT LE VIAN CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff and Defendant Le Vian Corp. ("Le Vian"), by and through their respective counsel of record herein, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the briefing schedule on Le Vian's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 117) (the "Motion") as follows: 1. Defendant Le Vian Corporation filed their Motion (ECF No. 117) on De
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT LE VIAN CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST)

Plaintiff and Defendant Le Vian Corp. ("Le Vian"), by and through their respective counsel of record herein, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the briefing schedule on Le Vian's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 117) (the "Motion") as follows:

1. Defendant Le Vian Corporation filed their Motion (ECF No. 117) on December 19, 2016.

2. Plaintiff Stevenson Fisher's Response to the Motion is due January 9, 2017, which date is hereby extended 14 days until January 23, 2017.

3. Defendant Le Vian Corporation's Reply will be due 14 days after Plaintiff's Response, on or before February 6, 2017.

4. The extension was requested by Plaintiff's counsel due to their busy workload schedule and other deadlines, including having to fly out of state for depositions the week of January 2, 2017, and the Reply in Support of Motion for Class Certification in this case, which is also due January 9, 2017, when the Response to Le Vian's Motion for Summary Judgment would otherwise be due. The parties thus agree that good cause exists for the stipulated extension pursuant to LR IA 6-1.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Consistent with the above Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall file the Response to Defendant Le Vian Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment on or before January 23, 2017; and

2. Defendant Le Vian Corporation shall file its Reply, on or before February 6, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer