Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bank of America, N.A. v. Alturas at Mountain's Edge Homeowners Association, 2:15-cv-01097-GMN-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171222h00 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 64 AND 65] FIRST REQUEST GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Bank of America, N.A. ( BANA ) and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ( SFR ) respectfully submit the following stipulation to allow BANA seven additional days to respond to SFR's renewed motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 65: BANA filed its motion for summary judgment on November 13, 2017. (ECF No. 64.) SFR filed its renewed motion for su
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 64 AND 65]

FIRST REQUEST

Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) respectfully submit the following stipulation to allow BANA seven additional days to respond to SFR's renewed motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 65:

BANA filed its motion for summary judgment on November 13, 2017. (ECF No. 64.) SFR filed its renewed motion for summary judgment on November 13, 2017. (ECF No. 65.) Both parties deadline to respond to each other's motions is December 4, 2017. L.R. 7-2(d).

The parties stipulate to extending the response deadlines by seven days, to December 11, 2017, to allow the parties additional time to more fully review the points and authorities raised in each other's motions for summary judgment.

This is the parties' first request for an extension, and is not made to cause delay or prejudice to any party. Dated this the 4th day of December, 2017. Dated this the 4th day of December, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer