Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bank of America, N.A. v. Sunset Ridge Limited Homeowners Association, 2:16-cv-00797-GMN-NJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160527d10 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: May 25, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO OPPOSE DEFENDANT SUNSET RIDGE LIMITED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 8] (Second Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. ( plaintiff ) and defendant Sunset Ridge Limited Homeowners Association ( defendant ) hereby stipulate and agree as follows: The parties hereby stipulate and agree plaintiff's time to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. #8) shall be continued fro
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO OPPOSE DEFENDANT SUNSET RIDGE LIMITED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 8]

(Second Request)

Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. (plaintiff) and defendant Sunset Ridge Limited Homeowners Association (defendant) hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

The parties hereby stipulate and agree plaintiff's time to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. #8) shall be continued from May 27, 2016 until June 3, 2016.

This is the second request for an extension of this deadline. Plaintiff requests the additional time to afford it the opportunity to adequately respond to defendant's motion to dismiss in a coordinated manner, as the same or similar motion by these and similarly-situated parties have been filed in other cases. The parties submit this request in good faith without the purpose of undue delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer