CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiff TPOV Enterprise 16, LLC's ("TPOV 16") Motion for the Issuance of Letters Rogatory (ECF No. 92) and Motion to Seal Exhibits in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for the Issuance of Letters Rogatory (ECF No. 94). For the reasons discussed below, TPOV 16's motions are granted.
This case involves two related contracts TPOV 16 entered into in November 2011. (ECF No. 92 at 2). TPOV 16 asserts that Defendant Paris Las Vegas Operating Company's ("Paris") breached one of these contracts. (Id. at 3). "Important to Plaintiff's claims is taking discovery of the facts and circumstances underlying the formation" of the two contracts, including the deposition of Trevor James, who "was an active participant in the discussions and negotiations surrounding the formation of the" two contracts. (Id.).
TPOV 16 now moves to issue letters rogatory to England, where Trevor James is believed to be located, to compel his deposition. (Id. at 4). TPOV 16 also moves to seal certain exhibits to its motion to issue letters rogatory according to the parties' stipulated protective order. (ECF No. 94). Paris does not oppose the motion to issue letters rogatory, and asserts that the exhibits TPOV 16 moves to seal contain confidential business information that could result in injury to the parties if it became public. (ECF No. 95).
"Courts have recognized a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents." Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal citations and quotations omitted). However, the public's right to access is "not absolute." Id. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) allows the Court to issue a protective order to govern discovery, as necessary to protect a party from "annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense."
The parties seek to seal ECF Nos. 93, 93-1, and 93-2. (ECF No. 94). Paris asserts that these documents contain "confidential, non-public business information." (ECF No. 95 at 3). After reviewing ECF Nos. 93, 93-1, and 93-2, the Court agrees that they include confidential, non-public communications regarding contract negotiations. Therefore, the Court will allow ECF Nos. 93, 93-1, and 93-2 to remain under seal.
A deposition may be taken in a foreign country "under a letter of request," such as a letter rogatory. Fed. R. Civ. P. 28(b)(1)(B). "A letter of request...may be issued: (A) on appropriate terms after an application and notice of it; and (B) without a showing that taking the deposition in another manner is impracticable or inconvenient." Fed. R. Civ. P. 28(b)(2).
The Court finds that issuing a letter rogatory is justified in this case. TPOV 16 has made a showing that Trevor James has relevant information in this case. The proposed Request for International Judicial Assistance (Letter Rogatory) contains the necessary and appropriate terms. In addition, by filing a non-opposition to the motion, Paris has consented to the motion. LR 7-2(d).
ACCORDINGLY, and for good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that TPOV 16's Motion for the Issuance of Letters Rogatory (ECF No. 92) and Motion to Seal Exhibits in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for the Issuance of Letters Rogatory (ECF No. 94) are GRANTED. Attached to this Order is the proposed Request for International Judicial Assistance (Letter Rogatory) signed by Magistrate Judge Ferenbach.
To the Appropriate Judicial Authority of the United Kingdom:
The United States District Court of Nevada presents its compliments to the appropriate judicial authority of the United Kingdom, and requests international judicial assistance to obtain evidence through oral testimony to be used in a civil proceeding before this court in the above captioned matter. A trial on this matter is not yet scheduled.
This court requests the assistance described herein as necessary in the interests of justice. The assistance requested is that the appropriate judicial authority of the United Kingdom compel the appearance of the below named individual to give evidence through oral testimony.
As set forth in the Complaint (ECF No. 1), Counterclaim Defendant, TPOV Enterprises, LLC ("TPOV") and Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC ("Paris") jointly conceived and funded the capital investment in the restaurant, Gordon Ramsay Steak (the "Restaurant"), which utilized the intellectual property owned by celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay ("Ramsay"). In November 2011, TPOV and Paris entered into a Development, Operation and License Agreement (the "TPOV Agreement"). Simultaneously, and as an express condition of entering into the TPOV Agreement, Paris entered into an integrated Development, Operation and License Agreement with Ramsay and Gordon Ramsay Holdings Limited (the "Ramsay Agreement").
The Restaurant opened in Las Vegas in May 2012 and has been a profitable operation to this day. Despite this success, Paris purported to terminate the TPOV Agreement. The integrated Ramsay Agreement was not terminated, and the Restaurant continues to operate. TPOV Enterprises 16, LLC was assigned TPOV's interest in the TPOV Agreement in or around April 2016 and commenced this action as a result of Paris' wrongful termination of the TPOV Agreement alleging breaches of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, and seeking declaratory relief under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 30 and 28 U.S.C. § 2201-2202 and an accounting.
In the furtherance of justice and by the proper and usual process of this court, the United States District Court of Nevada assures the judicial authorities of the United Kingdom that it is willing to provide similar cooperation and assistance to the judicial authorities of the United Kingdom in the event that the United Kingdom requests similar assistance.
Plaintiff is willing to reimburse the judicial authorities of the United Kingdom for its costs incurred in the execution of this Court's Letter Rogatory, up to $5,000.00 USD. Plaintiff requests to be contacted if the amount to execute this Letter Rogatory will be more than $5,000.00 USD. The contact information for the party submitting the payment is as follows:
It is requested that the depositions upon oral examination requested hereby be taken in the manner provided by Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a copy of which is attached hereto as
When this Request is executed in accordance with the directions given herein, the Request and the transcripts of the depositions and any exhibits are to be enclosed in an envelope bearing the name of this action and the name of the person deposed, and mailed with all convenient speed to the Clerk of the Honorable Judge Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, Lloyd D. George U.S. Courthouse, 333 S. Las Vegas Blvd., Las Vegas, Nevada 89101.