Filed: Dec. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO KEYNOTE PROPERTIES, LLC'S RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 61] [FIRST REQUEST] GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., defendant Keynote Properties, LLC, and defendant Pueblo at Sante Fe Condominium Association, Inc. stipulate as follows: 1. BANA filed its supplement to motion for partial summary judgment on November 14, 2018. [ECF No. 60.]
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO KEYNOTE PROPERTIES, LLC'S RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 61] [FIRST REQUEST] GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., defendant Keynote Properties, LLC, and defendant Pueblo at Sante Fe Condominium Association, Inc. stipulate as follows: 1. BANA filed its supplement to motion for partial summary judgment on November 14, 2018. [ECF No. 60.] ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY TO KEYNOTE PROPERTIES, LLC'S RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.'S SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 61] [FIRST REQUEST]
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A., defendant Keynote Properties, LLC, and defendant Pueblo at Sante Fe Condominium Association, Inc. stipulate as follows:
1. BANA filed its supplement to motion for partial summary judgment on November 14, 2018. [ECF No. 60.] Keynote filed it response to BANA's supplement on December 5, 2018. [ECF No. 61.] BANA's reply is currently due on December 12, 2018.
2. Pueblo At Sante Fe Condominium Association, Inc. filed its response to BANA's supplement on December 10, 2018. [ECF No. 62.] BANA's reply is currently due on December 24, 2018.
3. The parties agree BANA shall have twelve (12) additional days to file its reply to Keynote's response and both replies will now be due on January 5, 2019.
4. This is the first request for an extension of either deadline and is not made for purposes of undue delay. The extension is requested because both Keynote's and Pueblo's responses to BANA's supplement raise similar arguments that can best be addressed in one reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
