Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Doe v. City of Las Vegas,, 2:19-CV-00382-GMN-PAL. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190521739 Visitors: 21
Filed: May 10, 2019
Latest Update: May 10, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND (DKT 1) BRENDA WEKSLER , Magistrate Judge . Defendant, Jarod Barto (hereinafter "Defendant Barto" or "Barto"), by and through his counsel of record, Marc P. Cook, Esq., of the law firm of Cook & Kelesis, Ltd., and Plaintiff Jane Doe, (hereinafter "Plaintiff" or "Jane Doe") by and through her counsel of record Jenny L. Foley, Esq., of the law firm of HKM Employment Attorneys, LLP, and
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND (DKT 1)

Defendant, Jarod Barto (hereinafter "Defendant Barto" or "Barto"), by and through his counsel of record, Marc P. Cook, Esq., of the law firm of Cook & Kelesis, Ltd., and Plaintiff Jane Doe, (hereinafter "Plaintiff" or "Jane Doe") by and through her counsel of record Jenny L. Foley, Esq., of the law firm of HKM Employment Attorneys, LLP, and hereby Stipulates as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Defendant Barto shall have up to and including May 31, 2019, in which to file his Answer and/or Responsive Pleading to Plaintiffs Complaint and Jury Demand (Dkt 1).

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Barto shall have up to and including May 31, 2019, in which to file his Answer and/or Responsive Pleading.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer