Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CALVERT v. ELLIS, 2:13-cv-00464-APG-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20160119c13 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . The parties have filed several motions in limine in anticipation of trial. Per my Civil Standing Order No. 1, which is posted on my court webpage, counsel should meet and confer to determine whether the potential evidentiary disputes mentioned in the various motions actually exist and can be narrowed or eliminated. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer about the substance of these (a
More

ORDER REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO MEET AND CONFER

The parties have filed several motions in limine in anticipation of trial. Per my Civil Standing Order No. 1, which is posted on my court webpage, counsel should meet and confer to determine whether the potential evidentiary disputes mentioned in the various motions actually exist and can be narrowed or eliminated.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer about the substance of these (and any other contemplated) motions in limine. If agreements are reached on any motions, in whole or in part, the prophylactic goal of motions in limine may be obtained by incorporating the agreements into a stipulation and proposed order for me to consider. Should the parties not reach agreement, the parties must file a certificate stating that counsel actually conferred in good faith to resolve the issue and confirming which motions remain in dispute. Failure to file the certificate of counsel will result in the denial of all motions in limine.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer