Filed: Apr. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 02, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS AND ROGERS DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT (First Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, Defendant Airbnb, Inc., ("Airbnb"), defendants Christopher Gregory Rogers, Rogers Holdings, II, LLC, Barbara L. Rogers, Dannie Earl Rogers, and the Rogers Family Trust (collectively the "Rogers Defendants") and plaintiffs Colin Marshall, Caroline Ven
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS AND ROGERS DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT (First Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, Defendant Airbnb, Inc., ("Airbnb"), defendants Christopher Gregory Rogers, Rogers Holdings, II, LLC, Barbara L. Rogers, Dannie Earl Rogers, and the Rogers Family Trust (collectively the "Rogers Defendants") and plaintiffs Colin Marshall, Caroline Vent..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS AND ROGERS DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT
(First Request)
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, Defendant Airbnb, Inc., ("Airbnb"), defendants Christopher Gregory Rogers, Rogers Holdings, II, LLC, Barbara L. Rogers, Dannie Earl Rogers, and the Rogers Family Trust (collectively the "Rogers Defendants") and plaintiffs Colin Marshall, Caroline Ventola, Chris Cheng, Daniel Dykes, and Winston Cheng (collectively "Plaintiffs"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiffs and Rogers Defendants time to file reply briefs to Airbnb's Opposition to Motion for Determination of Good Faith Settlement (ECF No. 31) ("Opposition") shall be extended up to and including April 6, 2018. The reason for the stipulation for extension of time is the complexity of factual issues raised in Airbnb's Opposition and that counsel have been travelling during the time to draft a reply. This is the first stipulation for extension of time for Plaintiffs and Rogers Defendants to file its reply to Airbnb's Opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
