Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Diaz v. Chase, 2:19-cv-00020-JCM-VCF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190222c91 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST) CAM FERENBACH , District Judge . Plaintiff Maria Diaz, ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. erroneously sued as "Chase" ("Chase"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Chase's deadline to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint in this matter shall be extended to Friday, March 29,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., TO FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

(SECOND REQUEST)

Plaintiff Maria Diaz, ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. erroneously sued as "Chase" ("Chase"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Chase's deadline to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint in this matter shall be extended to Friday, March 29, 2019; and, 2. During the pendency of the referenced extension, Chase shall participate in any conference in furtherance of Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(f) and LR 26-1.

This second request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so the parties may continue to discuss the informal resolution of the claims asserted in this case as against Chase.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer